In recent times there have been interesting attempts to introduce a mind-independent present in Minkowski spacetime, a structure that has also been regarded as capable of explaining some aspects of our subjective experience of time, in particular the fact that we share a “now” but not a “here”. Considering that Minkowski spacetime is the arena for three out of the four interactions postulated by contemporary physics, this claim, if correct, would be remarkable. Against the prevailing opinion of last century’s major physicists and philosophers, we would have in fact discovered that it is possible to find a now (even a “transient one”) in any contemporary physical theory whose spatiotemporal arena has the structure of Minkowski spacetime. At the same time, we would have gone some way toward a rapprochement of “the manifest image” of time − characterized by a cosmically extended, transient now − with the physical image, traditionally dominated by the picture of a block universe in which “the present is absent” because regarded as purely mind-dependent.

Dorato, M. (2011). The Alexandroff present and Minkowski spacetime: why it cannot do what it has been asked to do. In W.G. D.Dieks (a cura di), Explanation, Prediction, and confirmation (pp. 379-394). HEIDELBERG, DORDRECHT, LONDON : Springer-Verlag BERLIN-HEIDELBERG [10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_26].

The Alexandroff present and Minkowski spacetime: why it cannot do what it has been asked to do

DORATO, Mauro
2011-01-01

Abstract

In recent times there have been interesting attempts to introduce a mind-independent present in Minkowski spacetime, a structure that has also been regarded as capable of explaining some aspects of our subjective experience of time, in particular the fact that we share a “now” but not a “here”. Considering that Minkowski spacetime is the arena for three out of the four interactions postulated by contemporary physics, this claim, if correct, would be remarkable. Against the prevailing opinion of last century’s major physicists and philosophers, we would have in fact discovered that it is possible to find a now (even a “transient one”) in any contemporary physical theory whose spatiotemporal arena has the structure of Minkowski spacetime. At the same time, we would have gone some way toward a rapprochement of “the manifest image” of time − characterized by a cosmically extended, transient now − with the physical image, traditionally dominated by the picture of a block universe in which “the present is absent” because regarded as purely mind-dependent.
2011
978-94-007-1179-2
Dorato, M. (2011). The Alexandroff present and Minkowski spacetime: why it cannot do what it has been asked to do. In W.G. D.Dieks (a cura di), Explanation, Prediction, and confirmation (pp. 379-394). HEIDELBERG, DORDRECHT, LONDON : Springer-Verlag BERLIN-HEIDELBERG [10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_26].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/167528
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact