We consider a sequential equilibrium model over two periods, during the first of which agents have perfect information and their expectations are formed as if there were complete future markets. We show that, in the second period, equilibrium prices may well be different from those expected, without any unexpected change having occurred. This result highlights a lack of correspondence between the perfect foresight hypothesis and that of complete markets.

Fratini, S.M., Levrero, E.S. (2009). A remark on the supposed equivalence between complete markets and perfect foresight hypothesis.

A remark on the supposed equivalence between complete markets and perfect foresight hypothesis

FRATINI, SAVERIO MARIA;LEVRERO, Enrico Sergio
2009-01-01

Abstract

We consider a sequential equilibrium model over two periods, during the first of which agents have perfect information and their expectations are formed as if there were complete future markets. We show that, in the second period, equilibrium prices may well be different from those expected, without any unexpected change having occurred. This result highlights a lack of correspondence between the perfect foresight hypothesis and that of complete markets.
2009
Fratini, S.M., Levrero, E.S. (2009). A remark on the supposed equivalence between complete markets and perfect foresight hypothesis.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/190171
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact