This chapter provides a formal and pragmatic characterization of dislocation and framing, based on a comparative analysis of Romance languages. Given their shared quality as non-operator A΄-dependencies, dislocated constituents and framesetters are both treated as instances of topicalization and distinguished in terms of “sentence topics” and “limiting topics”, respectively. A typology of topics is then proposed, showing the correlation between discourse functions, prosodic properties and dedicated positions in the C-domain. In particular, sentence and limiting topics are illustrated and confronted for their intonational contours, morpho-syntactic properties (such as reconstruction, minimality and WCO effects), derivation, position in the functional array and role in the conversational dynamics. Attention is also paid to clitic resumption and a comparison with another type of dislocation, namely marginalization, is proposed. Based on naturalistic data and interpretive judgments, evidence is provided that framing must be kept distinct from dislocation and forms an independent discourse category.

Frascarelli, M. (2017). Dislocations and framings. In Elisabeth Stark and Andreas Dufter (a cura di), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax (pp. 472-501). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter [10.1515/9783110377088-013].

Dislocations and framings

Mara Frascarelli
Formal Analysis
2017-01-01

Abstract

This chapter provides a formal and pragmatic characterization of dislocation and framing, based on a comparative analysis of Romance languages. Given their shared quality as non-operator A΄-dependencies, dislocated constituents and framesetters are both treated as instances of topicalization and distinguished in terms of “sentence topics” and “limiting topics”, respectively. A typology of topics is then proposed, showing the correlation between discourse functions, prosodic properties and dedicated positions in the C-domain. In particular, sentence and limiting topics are illustrated and confronted for their intonational contours, morpho-syntactic properties (such as reconstruction, minimality and WCO effects), derivation, position in the functional array and role in the conversational dynamics. Attention is also paid to clitic resumption and a comparison with another type of dislocation, namely marginalization, is proposed. Based on naturalistic data and interpretive judgments, evidence is provided that framing must be kept distinct from dislocation and forms an independent discourse category.
2017
978-3110376937
Frascarelli, M. (2017). Dislocations and framings. In Elisabeth Stark and Andreas Dufter (a cura di), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax (pp. 472-501). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter [10.1515/9783110377088-013].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/326822
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact