Benvenuti nell'Anagrafe della Ricerca d'Ateneo
La valutazione delle attività di ricerca che si svolgono nelle università ha assunto un'importanza rilevante sia per l'intero sistema universitario sia all'interno di ogni singolo ateneo. Roma Tre si è quindi dotata di idonei strumenti informativi in grado di supportare al meglio le azioni di monitoraggio e di valutazione delle attività di ricerca svolte nei propri dipartimentied ha realizzato una Anagrafe della Ricerca di Ateneo.
EnglishThe problem of future contingents is one of the most ancient and debated puzzles in Western philosophy, and Supervaluationism is, today, one of the most prominent solutions to the problem. Recently, John MacFarlane has carried a well-known criticism to Supervaluationism (and all other standard approaches to future contingents) and put forward a new solution of the problem of future contingents, which is known as Double Time Reference Theory (DTRT). Here, we compare DTRT with Supervaluationist semantics, and we show that the success of MacFarlane’s criticism crucially depends on the expressivity of the language adopted. Once a reasonable expressive power is granted, however, MacFarlane’s criticism no longer applies.
Ciuni, R., & Proietti, C. (2019). Future Contingents, Supervaluationism, and Relative Truth. In Third Pisa Colloquium in Logic, Language and Epistemology. Essays in Honor of Mauro Mariani and Carlo Marletti. (pp. 69-87). Pisa : ETS.
| Titolo: | Future Contingents, Supervaluationism, and Relative Truth | |
| Autori: | ||
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 | |
| Citazione: | Ciuni, R., & Proietti, C. (2019). Future Contingents, Supervaluationism, and Relative Truth. In Third Pisa Colloquium in Logic, Language and Epistemology. Essays in Honor of Mauro Mariani and Carlo Marletti. (pp. 69-87). Pisa : ETS. | |
| Abstract: | The problem of future contingents is one of the most ancient and debated puzzles in Western philosophy, and Supervaluationism is, today, one of the most prominent solutions to the problem. Recently, John MacFarlane has carried a well-known criticism to Supervaluationism (and all other standard approaches to future contingents) and put forward a new solution of the problem of future contingents, which is known as Double Time Reference Theory (DTRT). Here, we compare DTRT with Supervaluationist semantics, and we show that the success of MacFarlane’s criticism crucially depends on the expressivity of the language adopted. Once a reasonable expressive power is granted, however, MacFarlane’s criticism no longer applies. | |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11590/402190 | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) |
File in questo prodotto:
Copyright © 2022