The Thesis aims at a contemporary and interfering reading of a building conversion process considering social inclusion in the ex-ante evaluation phase. The aim is to mutually connect the measurement of the economic, social and environmental performance of a transformation process in a single logical and methodological framework divided into three consequential phases according to the proposed system. The result is an evaluation system defined as such because it consists of three subsets, delineated by as many phases, each of which responds to a specific evaluation question: “Which building conversion” to define which building is to be converted; “What to convert into the building?” to choose the preferred functional scenario of the building identified; “How to convert the building?” for the project selection relevant to the functional scenario. In this manner, the system provides logical and methodological support to the different decision processes within a construction process, in particular for the ex-ante phases, at the pre-feasibility and feasibility levels. The system is structured on an evaluation toolkit consisting of hardware elements, as characterizing and contingent components in each phase, and software elements as modifiable components to be included in the evaluation grid, depending on the objectives of each phase. The Thesis goes into detail on the experimentation for the second phase “Functional Scenario Preference”. It also proposes the hybridization of multi-criteria models and inclusive participatory models to justify the choice of intervention according to the stakeholder categories envisaged for each phase through the integration of a dual system of indicators belonging to the same evaluation criteria.
La Tesi propone una lettura contemporanea e interferente del processo di riconversione edilizia, considerando l’inclusione sociale nella fase di valutazione ex-ante. L’obiettivo è quello di connettere in maniera sistemica la misurazione delle prestazioni economiche, sociali e ambientali di un processo di trasformazione all’interno di un unico quadro metodologico, articolato in tre fasi consequenziali secondo il sistema proposto. Il risultato è un sistema di valutazione così definito in quanto composto da tre sottoinsiemi, corrispondenti ad altrettante fasi, ognuna delle quali risponde a una specifica domanda valutativa: Quale riconversione?, per individuare quale edificio debba essere oggetto di trasformazione; In cosa riconvertire?, per selezionare lo scenario funzionale preferibile tra quelli individuati; Come riconvertire?, per la selezione del progetto più idoneo in riferimento allo scenario funzionale prescelto. In tal modo, il sistema fornisce un supporto ai differenti contesti decisionali all’interno del processo edilizio, con particolare riferimento alle fasi ex-ante, a livello di prefattibilità e fattibilità. Il sistema si struttura attraverso un toolkit valutativo composto da elementi hardware, intesi come componenti caratterizzanti e contingenti in ciascuna fase, ed elementi software, concepiti come componenti modificabili da inserire nella griglia valutativa a seconda degli obiettivi specifici di ciascuna fase. La Tesi approfondisce in particolare la fase del sistema sperimentando la Function Scenario Preference, proponendo l’ibridazione di modelli multi-criteriali e modelli partecipativi inclusivi, al fine di giustificare la scelta dell’intervento in funzione delle categorie di stakeholder previste per ciascuna fase, attraverso l’integrazione di un doppio sistema di indicatori appartenenti ai medesimi criteri valutativi.
Masanotti, A. (2025). Strumenti di valutazione multi-criteriale e inclusiva per la riconversione edilizia Multi-criteria and inclusive evaluation tools for building conversion.
Strumenti di valutazione multi-criteriale e inclusiva per la riconversione edilizia Multi-criteria and inclusive evaluation tools for building conversion
antonella masanotti
2025-06-09
Abstract
The Thesis aims at a contemporary and interfering reading of a building conversion process considering social inclusion in the ex-ante evaluation phase. The aim is to mutually connect the measurement of the economic, social and environmental performance of a transformation process in a single logical and methodological framework divided into three consequential phases according to the proposed system. The result is an evaluation system defined as such because it consists of three subsets, delineated by as many phases, each of which responds to a specific evaluation question: “Which building conversion” to define which building is to be converted; “What to convert into the building?” to choose the preferred functional scenario of the building identified; “How to convert the building?” for the project selection relevant to the functional scenario. In this manner, the system provides logical and methodological support to the different decision processes within a construction process, in particular for the ex-ante phases, at the pre-feasibility and feasibility levels. The system is structured on an evaluation toolkit consisting of hardware elements, as characterizing and contingent components in each phase, and software elements as modifiable components to be included in the evaluation grid, depending on the objectives of each phase. The Thesis goes into detail on the experimentation for the second phase “Functional Scenario Preference”. It also proposes the hybridization of multi-criteria models and inclusive participatory models to justify the choice of intervention according to the stakeholder categories envisaged for each phase through the integration of a dual system of indicators belonging to the same evaluation criteria.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.