The test of the Cartesian mechanism puts in crisis the plant analogy that had just regained momentum in early modernity. By representing the living body as a machine, Descartes (apparently) sacrificed the study of plants in his natural philosophy. However, when his mechanistic analogy lags behind his physiological explanation, the comparison between plants and animals resurfaces and reveals its originality. First, Descartes defines plants as hydraulic machines (just like animals); second, he uses the animal explanation to describe plants; third, he describes structural differences between living bodies. If the same mechanical laws are applicable to bodies, a mechanical gradation unfolds between plants and animals. Then the Cartesians in turn assume the same distinction when they propose a plant-animal analogy as part of the philosophical mechanism that determines modern culture.

Baldassarri, F. (2023). Same Machine, Different Structure: Animal-Plant Analogy in Cartesian Mechanical Physiology. In S. Carvallo, A. Macé (a cura di), Analogies végétales dans la connaissance de la vie de l’Antiquité à l’Âge classique (pp. 225-244). BESANÇON : Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.

Same Machine, Different Structure: Animal-Plant Analogy in Cartesian Mechanical Physiology

Fabrizio Baldassarri
2023-01-01

Abstract

The test of the Cartesian mechanism puts in crisis the plant analogy that had just regained momentum in early modernity. By representing the living body as a machine, Descartes (apparently) sacrificed the study of plants in his natural philosophy. However, when his mechanistic analogy lags behind his physiological explanation, the comparison between plants and animals resurfaces and reveals its originality. First, Descartes defines plants as hydraulic machines (just like animals); second, he uses the animal explanation to describe plants; third, he describes structural differences between living bodies. If the same mechanical laws are applicable to bodies, a mechanical gradation unfolds between plants and animals. Then the Cartesians in turn assume the same distinction when they propose a plant-animal analogy as part of the philosophical mechanism that determines modern culture.
2023
978-2-84867-974-7
L’épreuve du mécanisme cartésien met en crise l’analogie végétale qui vient de retrouver un nouvel élan au début de la modernité. En représentant le corps vivant comme une machine, Descartes sacrifie (apparemment) l’étude des plantes dans sa philosophie naturelle. Pourtant, lorsque son analogie mécaniste marque le pas dans son explication physiologique, la comparaison entre plantes et animaux ressurgit et révèle son originalité. Premièrement, Descartes définit les végétaux comme des machines hydrauliques (tout comme les animaux) ; deuxièmement, il utilise l’explication animale pour décrire les végétaux ; troisièmement, il décrit des différences structurales entre les corps vivants. Si les mêmes lois mécaniques sont applicables aux corps, une gradation mécanique se déploie entre plantes et animaux. Ensuite, les Cartésiens assument à leur tour la même distinction lorsqu’ils proposent une analogie plantes-animaux dans le cadre du mécanisme philosophique qui détermine la culture moderne.
Baldassarri, F. (2023). Same Machine, Different Structure: Animal-Plant Analogy in Cartesian Mechanical Physiology. In S. Carvallo, A. Macé (a cura di), Analogies végétales dans la connaissance de la vie de l’Antiquité à l’Âge classique (pp. 225-244). BESANÇON : Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/525511
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact