This chapter argues that the Sophist prompted the reflection of the Early Academics on at least two main fronts: (1) the elaboration of binary divisions of entities (Xenocrates, Hermodorus, divisiones aristoteleae, Aristotle’s On the Good); and (2) the critical reaction to Eleatic monism, as it emerges especially from Aristotle’s Metaphysics N 2. In doing so, this essay also brings out ways in which this can shed light on aspects of the background of Aristotle’s ontology and theory of predication. Further, it re-discussed the problem, recently brought to scholarly attention, of the Early Academic composition of a textual canon functional to a work of systematization of Platonism.
Granieri, R. (2026). Categories, Being and Not-Being: The Sophist in the Early Academy. In Roberto Granieri e Francesco Fronterotta (a cura di), Plato's Sophist in Antiquity (pp. 20-42). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press [10.1017/9781009761857].
Categories, Being and Not-Being: The Sophist in the Early Academy
Roberto Granieri
2026-01-01
Abstract
This chapter argues that the Sophist prompted the reflection of the Early Academics on at least two main fronts: (1) the elaboration of binary divisions of entities (Xenocrates, Hermodorus, divisiones aristoteleae, Aristotle’s On the Good); and (2) the critical reaction to Eleatic monism, as it emerges especially from Aristotle’s Metaphysics N 2. In doing so, this essay also brings out ways in which this can shed light on aspects of the background of Aristotle’s ontology and theory of predication. Further, it re-discussed the problem, recently brought to scholarly attention, of the Early Academic composition of a textual canon functional to a work of systematization of Platonism.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


