The aim of the present study is to develop and compare two different automatic methods for ac- curacy evaluation in ultrasound phantom measurements on B-mode images: both of them give as a result the relative error e between measured distances, performed by 14 brand new ultrasound medical scanners, and nominal distances, among nylon wires embedded in a reference test ob- ject. The first method is based on a least squares estimation, while the second one applies the mean value of the same distance evaluated at different locations in ultrasound image (same distance method). Results for both of them are proposed and explained.

Branca, F.p., Sciuto, S.A., Scorza, A. (2012). Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 83(10) [10.1063/1.4755811].

Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement

SCIUTO, SALVATORE ANDREA;SCORZA, ANDREA
2012-01-01

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to develop and compare two different automatic methods for ac- curacy evaluation in ultrasound phantom measurements on B-mode images: both of them give as a result the relative error e between measured distances, performed by 14 brand new ultrasound medical scanners, and nominal distances, among nylon wires embedded in a reference test ob- ject. The first method is based on a least squares estimation, while the second one applies the mean value of the same distance evaluated at different locations in ultrasound image (same distance method). Results for both of them are proposed and explained.
2012
Branca, F.p., Sciuto, S.A., Scorza, A. (2012). Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 83(10) [10.1063/1.4755811].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/117747
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact