Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
Benvenuti nell'Anagrafe della Ricerca d'Ateneo
A fully compensating uranium-scintillator calorimeter was constructed for the ZEUS detector at HERA. Several of the barrel calorimeter modules were subjected to beam tests at Fermilab before shipping them to DESY for installation. The calibrations of the modules used beams of electrons and hadrons, measuring the uniformity of the response, and checking the resolution. The runs also provided opportunity to test a large fraction of the actual ZEUS calorimeter readout system in an integrated beam environment more than one year before HERA turn on. The experiment utilized two computer controlled mechanical structures. one of which was capable of holding up to four modules in order to study shower containment, and a magnetic spectrometer with a high resolution beam tracking system. During two running periods, beams of 6 to 110 GeV containing e, mu, pi, and pBAR were used. The results show energy resolutions of 35%/square-root E for hadrons and 19%/square-root E for electrons, uniformities at the 1% level, energy nonlinearity less than 1%, and equal response for electrons and hadrons.
ZEUS Collaboration M., D., D., K., S., M., B., M., J., R., S., R., et al. (1993). BEAM TESTS OF THE ZEUS BARREL CALORIMETER. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 336(1-2), 23-52 [10.1016/0168-9002(93)91078-2].
BEAM TESTS OF THE ZEUS BARREL CALORIMETER
ZEUS Collaboration M. Derrick;D. Krakauer;S. Magill;B. Musgrave;J. Repond;S. Repond;R. Stanek;R. L. Talaga;J. Thron Argonne National Laboratory;Argonne, IL;USA 47 F. Arzarello;R. Ayad l;G. Bari;M. Basile;L. Bellagamba;D. Boscherini;A. Bruni;G. Bruni;P. Bruni;G. Cara Romeo;G. Castellini 2;M. Chiarini;L. Cifarelli;F. Cindolo;F. Ciralli;A. Contin;S. D'Auria;C. Del Papa;F. Frasconi;P. Giusti;G. Iacobucci;G. Laurenti;G. Levi;Q. Lin;B. Lisowski;G. Maccarrone;A. Margotti;T. Massam;R. Nania;C. Nemoz;F. Palmonari;G. Sartorelli;R. Timellini;Y. Zamora Garcia l;A. Zichichi University;INFN Bologna;Bologna;Italy 39 A. Bargende;J. Crittenden;K. Desch;B. Diekmann;T. Doeker;A. Frey;M. Geerts;G. Geitz;H. Hartmann;D. Haun;K. Heinloth;E. Hilger;H. P. Jakob;S. Kramarczyk;M. Kiickes 3;A. Mass;S. Mengel;J. Mollen;D. Monaldi4;H. Miisch 5;E. Paul;R. Schattevoy;J. L. Schneider;D. Schramm;R. Wedemeyer Physikalisches Institut der Universitiit Bonn;Bonn;Federal Republic of Germany 36 A. Cassidy;D. G. Cussans;N. Dyce;B. Foster;R. Gilmore;G. P. Heath;H. F. Heath;M. Lancaster;T. J. Llewellyn;J. Malos;C. J. S. Morgado;R. J. Tapper;S. S. Wilson;R. Yoshida H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory;University of Bristol;Bristol;UK 46 R. R. Rau Brookhaven National Laboratory;Upton, L. I.;NY;USA 47 M. Arneodo;M. Schioppa;G. Susinno Calabria University;Physics Department;INFN, Cosenza;Italy 39 A. Bernstein;A. Caldwell;I. Gialas;J. A. Parsons;S. Ritz;F. Sciulli 6;P. B. Straub;L. Wai;S. Yang Columbia University;Nevis Labs;Irvington on Hudson;NY;USA 48 P. Borzemski;J. Chwastowski 7;A. Dwura~ny;A. Eskreys;Z. Jakubowski 8 B. Niziot;K. Piotrzkowski;M. Zachara;L. Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics;Cracow;Poland 43 L. Adamczyk;B. Bednarek;K. Eskreys;K. Jelefi;D. Kisielewska;T. Kowalski;E. Rulikowska Zar~bska;L. Suszycki;J. Zaj0c Faculty of Physics;Nuclear T.e.c.h.n.i.q.u.e.s. Academy of Mining;Metallurgy, Cracow;Poland 43 T. Kgdzierski;A. Kotafiski;M. Przybyciefi Jagellonian University;Department of Physics;Cracow;Poland 43 L. A. T. Bauerdick;U. Behrens;J. K. Bienlein;S. B6ttcher;C. Coldewey;A. Dannemann;G. Drews;P. Erhard 9;M. Flasifiski 10;I. Fleck;R. Gl~iser l. l;p. G6ttlicher;B. Gutjahr;T. Haas;L. Hagge;W. Hain;D. Hasell;H. Hultschig;G. Jahnen 12;p. Joos;M. Kasemann;R. Klanner;W. Koch;L. K6pke;U. K6tz;H. Kowalski;W. Kr6ger;J. Kriiger;J. Labs;A. Ladage;B. L6hr;M. L6we;D. Lfike;J. Mainusch;O. Manczak;M. Momayezi 13;J. S. T. Ng;S. Nickel;D. Notz;K. U. P6snecker 14;M. Rohde;J. Roldfin 15;E. Ros 7;U. Schneekloth;J. Schroeder;W. Schulz;F. Selonke;E. Stiliaris 15;E. Tscheslog 17;T. Tsurugai;W. Vogel 17;G. Wolf;C. Youngman Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron DESE Hamburg;Federal Republic of Germany H. J. Grabosch;A. Leich;A. Meyer;C. Rethfeldt;S. Schlenstedt DESY Zeuthen;Institut fiir Hochenergiephysik;Zeuthen;Federal Republic of Germany G. Barbagli;A. Francescato;M. Nuti;P. Pelfer University;INFN, Florence;Italy 39 G. Anzivino;R. Casaccia;S. De Pasquale;S. Qian;L. Votano INFN;Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati;Frascati;Italy 39 A. Bamberger;A. Freidhof;T. Poser;S. S61dner Rembold;G. Theisen;T. Trefzger Physikalisches Institut der Universitgit Freiburg;Freiburg;Federal Republic of Germany 36 N. H. Brook;P. J. Bussey;A. T. Doyle;J. R. Forbes;V. A. Jamieson;C. Raine;D. H. Saxon Department of Physics;Astronomy;University of Glasgow;Glasgow;UK 46 H. Brtickmann 18;G. Gloth;U. Holm;H. Kammerlocher;B. Krebs;T. Neumann;K. Wick Hamburg University;1st Institute of Experimental Physics;Hamburg;Federal Republic of Germany 36 A. Fiirtjes;E. Lohrmann;J. Milewski 19;M. Nakahata 2°;N. Pavel;G. Poelz;W. Schott;J. Terron 15;F. Zetsche Hamburg U.n.i.v.e.r.s.i.t.y. Hnd Institute ofExperimental Physics;Hamburg;Federal Republic of Germany 36 T. C. Bacon;R. Beuselinck;I. Butterworth;E. Gallo;V. L. Harris;D. B. Miller;A. Prinias;J. K. Sedgbeer;A. Vorvolakos;A. Whitfield Imperial College London;High Energy Nuclear Physics Group;London;UK 46 T. Bienz;H. Kreutzmann;U. Mallik;E. McCliment;M. Roco;M. Z. Wang University of lowa;Physics;Astronomy Department;Iowa City;USA 47 P. Cloth;D. Filges Forschungszentrum Jiilich;lnstitut fiir Kernphysik;J.i.i.l.i.c.h. Federal Republic of Germany S. H. An;S. M. Hong;C. O. Kim;T. Y. Kim;S. W. Nam;S. K. Park;M. H. Suh;S. H. Yon Korea University;Seou[;Korea 4] R. Imlay;S. Kartik;H. J. Kim;R. R. McNeil;W. Metcalf;V. K. Nadendla Louisiana State University;Department ~ Physics;Astronomy;Baton Rouge;LA;USA 47 F. Barreiro 21;G. Cases;L. Herv~s 22;L. Labarga 22;j. del Peso;J. F. de Troc6niz 23 U.n.i.v.e.r. Aut6noma Madrid;Depto de Fisica Te6rlca;Madrid;Spain 45 F. Ikraiam;J. K. Mayer;G. R. Smith University of Manitoba;Department of Physics;Winnipeg, Manitoba;Canada 34 F. Corriveau;D. J. Gilkinson;D. S. Hanna 6;j. Hartmann;L. W. Hung;J. N. Lira;R. Meijer Drees;J. W. Mitchell;P. M. Patel;L. E. Sinclair;D. G. Stairs;M. S.t. Laurent;R. Ullmann McGill University;Department of Physics;Montreal, Quebec;Canada 34;35 G. L. Bashindzhagyan;P. F. Ermolov;L. K. Gladilin;Y. A. Golubkov;V. A. Kuzmin;E. N. Kuznetsov;A. A. Savin;A. G. Voronin;N. P. Zotov Moscow State University;Institute of Nuclear Pysics;Moscow;Russia 44 S. Bentvelsen;M. Botje;A. Dake;J. Engelen;P. de Jong;M. de Kamps;P. Kooijman;A. Kruse;H. van der Lugt;V. O'Dell;A. Tenner;H. Tiecke;H. Uijterwaa124;M. Vreeswijk;L. Wiggers;E. de Wolf;R. van Woudenberg N1KHEF Amsterdam;Amsterdam;Netherlands 42 B. Bylsma;L. S. Durkin;K. Honscheid;C. Li;T. Y. Ling;K. W. McLean;W. N. Murray;I. H. Park;T. A. Romanowski 25 R. Seidlein Ohio State University;Physics Department;Columbus, OH;USA 47 G. A. Blair;A. Byrne;R. J. Cashmore;A. M. Cooper Sarkar;R. C. E. Devenish;D. M. Gingrich 26;P. M. Hallam Baker 7 N. Harnew;T. Khatri;K. R. Long;P. Luffman;1. McArthur;P. Morawitz;J. Nash;S. J. P. Smith 27;N. C. Roocroft;F. F. Wilson Department of Physics;University of Oxford;Oxford;UK 46 G. Abbiendi;R. Brugnera;R. Carlin;F. Dal Corso;M. De Giorgi;U. Dosselli;F. Gasparini;S. Limentani;M. Morandin;M. Posocco;L. Stanco;R. Stroili;C. Voci Dipartimento di Fisica dell Universita;INFN, Padova;ltaly 39 J. M. Butterworth;J. Bulmahn;G. Feild;B. Y. Oh 28;j. Whitmore 29 Pennsylvania State University;Department of Physics;University Park;PA;USA 48 U. Contino;G. D'Agostini;M. Guida 30;M. Iori;MARI, Stefano Maria;G. Marini;M. Mattioli;A. Nigro Dipartimento di Fisica;Universiffz 'La Sapienza;INFN, Rome;Italy 39 J. C. Hart;N. A. McCubbin;K. Prytz;T. P. Shah;T. L. Short Rutherford Appleton Laboratory;Chilton, Didcot;Oxon;UK 46 E. Barberis;N. Cartiglia;C. Heusch;B. Hubbard;J. Leslie;W. Lockman;K. O'Shaughnessy;H. F. Sadrozinski;A. Seiden;D. Zer Zion University of California;Santa Cruz;CA;USA 47 E. Badura;J. Biltzinger;R. J. Seifert;A. H. Walenta;G. Zech Fachbereich Physik der Universitgit Gesamthochschule Siegen;Siegen;Federal Republic of Germany 36 S. Dagan 31;A. Levy School of Physics;Tel Aviv University;Tel Aviv;Israel 38 T. Hasegawa;M. Hazumi;T. Ishii;S. Kasai 32;M. Kuze;S. Mine;Y. Nagasawa;T. Nagira;M. Nakao;H. Okuno;I. Suzuki;K. Tokushuku;S. Yamada;Y. Yamazaki Institute for Nuclear Study;University of Tokyo;Tokyo;Japan 4° M. Chiba;R. Hamatsu;T. Hirose;S. Kitamura;S. Nagayama;Y. Nakamitsu Tokyo Metropolitan University;Department of Physics;Tokyo;Japan 4° R. Cirio;M. Costa;M. I. Ferrero;L. Lamberti;S. Maselli;C. Peroni;A. Solano;A. Staiano Universith di Torino;Dipartimento di Fisica Sperimentale;INFN, Torino;Italy 39 M. Dardo Facultd di Scienze;University of Torino;Alessandria;INFN Sezione di Torino;Torino;Italy 39 D. C. Bailey;D. Bandyopadhyay;F. Benard;S. Bhadra;M. Brkic;B. D. Burow;F. S. Chlebana;M. B. Crombie;G. F. Hartner;G. M. Levman;J. F. Martin;R. S. Orr;J. D. Prentice;C. R. Sampson;G. G. Stairs;R. J. Teuscher;T. S. Yoon University of Toronto;Department of Physics;Toronto, O.n.t.;Canada 34 F. W. Bullock;C. D. Catterall;J. C. Giddings;T. W. Jones;A. M. Khan;J. B. Lane;P. L. Makkar;D. Shaw;J. Shulman University College London;Physics;Astronomy Department;London;UK 46 K. Blankenship;J. Kochocki;B. Lu;L. W. Mo Virginia Polytechnic Institute;State University;Physics Department;Blacksburg, VA;USA 48 K. Charchuta;J. Ciborowski;J. Gajewski;G. Grzelak;M. Kasprzak;M. Krzyzanowski;K. Muchorowski;R. J. Nowak;J. M. Pawlak;A. Stopczyfiski;T. Tymieniecka;R. Walczak;A. K. Wr6blewski;J. A. Zakrzewski;A. F. Zarnecki Warsaw University;Institute of Experimental Physics;Warsaw;Poland 43 M. Adamus Institute for Nuclear Studies;Warsaw;Poland 43 H. Abramowicz 19;y. Eisenberg;C. Glasman 33;U. Karshon 31;A. Montag 3J;D. Revel;A. Shapira Weizmann Institute;Nuclear Physics Department;Rehovot;Israel 37 C. Foudas;C. Fordham;R. J. Loveless;A. Goussiou;I. Ali;B. Behrens;S. Dasu;D. D. Reeder;W. H. Smith;S. Silverstein University of Wisconsin;Department of Physics;Madison, W1;USA 47 W. R. Frisken;K. M. Furutani;Y. Iga York University;Department of Physics;North York;O.n.t.;Canada 34
1993-01-01
Abstract
A fully compensating uranium-scintillator calorimeter was constructed for the ZEUS detector at HERA. Several of the barrel calorimeter modules were subjected to beam tests at Fermilab before shipping them to DESY for installation. The calibrations of the modules used beams of electrons and hadrons, measuring the uniformity of the response, and checking the resolution. The runs also provided opportunity to test a large fraction of the actual ZEUS calorimeter readout system in an integrated beam environment more than one year before HERA turn on. The experiment utilized two computer controlled mechanical structures. one of which was capable of holding up to four modules in order to study shower containment, and a magnetic spectrometer with a high resolution beam tracking system. During two running periods, beams of 6 to 110 GeV containing e, mu, pi, and pBAR were used. The results show energy resolutions of 35%/square-root E for hadrons and 19%/square-root E for electrons, uniformities at the 1% level, energy nonlinearity less than 1%, and equal response for electrons and hadrons.
ZEUS Collaboration M., D., D., K., S., M., B., M., J., R., S., R., et al. (1993). BEAM TESTS OF THE ZEUS BARREL CALORIMETER. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 336(1-2), 23-52 [10.1016/0168-9002(93)91078-2].
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/119420
Citazioni
ND
230
227
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.