Benvenuti nell'Anagrafe della Ricerca d'Ateneo
La valutazione delle attività di ricerca che si svolgono nelle università ha assunto un'importanza rilevante sia per l'intero sistema universitario sia all'interno di ogni singolo ateneo. Roma Tre si è quindi dotata di idonei strumenti informativi in grado di supportare al meglio le azioni di monitoraggio e di valutazione delle attività di ricerca svolte nei propri dipartimentied ha realizzato una Anagrafe della Ricerca di Ateneo.
EnglishThe paper analyzes the move of discrediting the opponent as a means to persuasion in political debates. After analysis of a corpus of political debates, a typology of discrediting strategies is outlined, distinguished in terms of three criteria: the target—the feature of the opponent specifically attacked (dominance, competence, benevolence); the route through which it is attacked—topic, mode or directly the person; and the type of communicative act that conveys the attack (insult, criticism, correction…).
D'Errico F, Poggi I, & Vincze L (2012). Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates 2012, p.1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4. JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 1-16.
| Titolo: | Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates 2012, p.1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4 |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2012 |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | D'Errico F, Poggi I, & Vincze L (2012). Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates 2012, p.1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s12193-012-0098-4. JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 1-16. |
| Abstract: | The paper analyzes the move of discrediting the opponent as a means to persuasion in political debates. After analysis of a corpus of political debates, a typology of discrediting strategies is outlined, distinguished in terms of three criteria: the target—the feature of the opponent specifically attacked (dominance, competence, benevolence); the route through which it is attacked—topic, mode or directly the person; and the type of communicative act that conveys the attack (insult, criticism, correction…). |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11590/145061 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/11590/145061
Copyright © 2020