"\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on changes in the compliance function within major. European banks and other financial intermediaries and on the effects of Markets in Financial. Instruments Directive (MiFID) implementation.. Design\\\/methodology\\\/approach – The four areas of research seek to answer the following. questions: Is the positioning of the compliance function “at the top” of the organizational structure?. Are the roles attributed to the compliance function, their knowledge and their instruments consistent. with their responsibilities? Do the methodologies applied follow a qualitative and\\\/or a quantitative. approach? Is the interaction between the compliance function inside and outside the structure. appropriate to the goals of compliance? In total, 31 top international groups based in Europe were. invited to take part in the research, 16 of them accepted.. Findings – The authors observed a resolute adjustment to the regulations in terms of macrostructure. and high levels of compliance function competences in investment services and business knowledge,. with a low variation. The encouraging news coming out of the results of the research is the. confirmation of the presence of a connection between the compliance function and both the system of. values and of incentives.. Originality\\\/value – The paper’s international sample offers a unique opportunity to highlight the. critical areas of the compliance function within international groups, with growing operational. complexity in a framework of principle-based regulation.\""

P., M.T., G., G., Previati, D.A., P., S. (2013). Managing Compliance Risk after MiFID. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE, 21(1), 51-68 [10.1108/13581981311297821].

Managing Compliance Risk after MiFID

PREVIATI, Daniele Angelo;
2013-01-01

Abstract

"\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on changes in the compliance function within major. European banks and other financial intermediaries and on the effects of Markets in Financial. Instruments Directive (MiFID) implementation.. Design\\\/methodology\\\/approach – The four areas of research seek to answer the following. questions: Is the positioning of the compliance function “at the top” of the organizational structure?. Are the roles attributed to the compliance function, their knowledge and their instruments consistent. with their responsibilities? Do the methodologies applied follow a qualitative and\\\/or a quantitative. approach? Is the interaction between the compliance function inside and outside the structure. appropriate to the goals of compliance? In total, 31 top international groups based in Europe were. invited to take part in the research, 16 of them accepted.. Findings – The authors observed a resolute adjustment to the regulations in terms of macrostructure. and high levels of compliance function competences in investment services and business knowledge,. with a low variation. The encouraging news coming out of the results of the research is the. confirmation of the presence of a connection between the compliance function and both the system of. values and of incentives.. Originality\\\/value – The paper’s international sample offers a unique opportunity to highlight the. critical areas of the compliance function within international groups, with growing operational. complexity in a framework of principle-based regulation.\""
2013
P., M.T., G., G., Previati, D.A., P., S. (2013). Managing Compliance Risk after MiFID. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REGULATION AND COMPLIANCE, 21(1), 51-68 [10.1108/13581981311297821].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/267547
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact