This paper is about metaphysical ‘infinitism’, the view that there are, or could be, infinite chains of ontological dependence. Its main aim is to show that, contrary to widespread opinion, metaphysical infinitism is a coherent position. On the basis of this, it is then additionally argued that metaphysical infinitism need not fare worse than the more canonical ‘foundationalist’ alternatives when it comes to formulating metaphysical explanations. In the course of the discussion, a rather unexplored parallel with the debate concerning infinitism about justification is suggested.
Morganti, M. (2015). Dependence, Justification and Explanation: Must Reality Be Well-Founded?. ERKENNTNIS, 80, 555-572.
Dependence, Justification and Explanation: Must Reality Be Well-Founded?
MORGANTI, MATTEO
2015-01-01
Abstract
This paper is about metaphysical ‘infinitism’, the view that there are, or could be, infinite chains of ontological dependence. Its main aim is to show that, contrary to widespread opinion, metaphysical infinitism is a coherent position. On the basis of this, it is then additionally argued that metaphysical infinitism need not fare worse than the more canonical ‘foundationalist’ alternatives when it comes to formulating metaphysical explanations. In the course of the discussion, a rather unexplored parallel with the debate concerning infinitism about justification is suggested.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ERKE 10.1007_s10670-014-9655-4.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
201.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
201.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.