ABSTRACT. EXEMPLARITY AND IMITATION : GLORY AND SHAME IN SPINOZA’S ETHICS. In this paper, the author focuses on B. Spinoza’s Ethics in order to expound the connection between the themes of “exemplar humanae naturae”, “imitatio affectuum”, and a number of passions related to what we would today call “recognition”. What will emerge, in this way, is the value of this connection in relation to the transition from imagination to reason, from passion to virtue, from conflict to cooperation. First, the paper highlights the partial break that imitation introduces with respect to the affects connected to self-preservation; the decentralization to which this imitation forces an otherwise self-centered subject; the need for reciprocity and justice of which imitation is the bearer, and the possible transition to an ethical approach that it tends to promote. Secondly, it reflects upon the difficulties connected to the mimetic dynamic’s combination with other dispositions and with the struggle for recognition. Finally, it refers to a possible solution to these difficulties, offered by the role of education and habits in the construction of recognition criteria that can be, at the same time, imaginary and potentially shared.
Toto, F. (2016). Esemplarità e imitazione. Gloria e vergogna nell’‘Etica' di B. Spinoza. RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA(2), 221-242 [10.3280/SF2016-002003].
Esemplarità e imitazione. Gloria e vergogna nell’‘Etica' di B. Spinoza
TOTO, FRANCESCO
2016-01-01
Abstract
ABSTRACT. EXEMPLARITY AND IMITATION : GLORY AND SHAME IN SPINOZA’S ETHICS. In this paper, the author focuses on B. Spinoza’s Ethics in order to expound the connection between the themes of “exemplar humanae naturae”, “imitatio affectuum”, and a number of passions related to what we would today call “recognition”. What will emerge, in this way, is the value of this connection in relation to the transition from imagination to reason, from passion to virtue, from conflict to cooperation. First, the paper highlights the partial break that imitation introduces with respect to the affects connected to self-preservation; the decentralization to which this imitation forces an otherwise self-centered subject; the need for reciprocity and justice of which imitation is the bearer, and the possible transition to an ethical approach that it tends to promote. Secondly, it reflects upon the difficulties connected to the mimetic dynamic’s combination with other dispositions and with the struggle for recognition. Finally, it refers to a possible solution to these difficulties, offered by the role of education and habits in the construction of recognition criteria that can be, at the same time, imaginary and potentially shared.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.