Smaller historic towns, conventionally defined by a population threshold of five thousand inhabitants, differ in history, urban quality, levels of autonomy or dependence on other settlements. Despite their relevance - they are home to 17% of the population over a territory corresponding to approximately 54% of our Country – only fairly recently they have achieved an important role in the institutional agenda. This paper focuses on depopulation conditions, ageing and backwardness, poor employment and welfare opportunities, and, above all, "distance" from the most dynamic areas of the Peninsula, highlighting several scattered re-use and regeneration practices dealing with the built environment – either out of necessity or for holiday use - which has recently shown much greater resilience to seismic risk than new structures. Still, the gap between propensity of the urban elite in a general re-appropriation of lifestyles evoked by the historic towns and the decay and often irreversible abandonment affecting most of them could not be greater. As a matter of fact, being part both of urban planning and cultural heritage concerns, re-use and regeneration policies of such huge underused stock stand as imperative strategies, and conservation programming should meet both regional planning issues and urban renewal techniques.
Palazzo Anna Laura (2017). Centri minori e cultura della complessità. Problematiche, prospettive, traiettorie di riuso. ARCHITECTURE, CITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 11(33), 213-218.
|Titolo:||Centri minori e cultura della complessità. Problematiche, prospettive, traiettorie di riuso|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2017|
|Citazione:||Palazzo Anna Laura (2017). Centri minori e cultura della complessità. Problematiche, prospettive, traiettorie di riuso. ARCHITECTURE, CITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 11(33), 213-218.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|