The essay focuses on the new pre-litigation advice of ANAC (i.e. italian public procurement Authority), from the genesis since the recent evolutions. The analysis of this non-judicial remedy offered the chance to reflect on the more general issue of the differences between administrative procedure and judicial review. Starting from the contributions of traditional scholars about administrative appeal and contentious procedure, the essay identifies formal features that structurally characterize a "process" and, according to the prospective chosen, these elements have been combined with a functional analysis. After this survey, the new binding pre-litigation advice of ANAC is identified with the category of“administrative decision”and this conclusion brings specific results in terms of rules applicables. However the essay emphasizes that the notion of “process” has different meanings in each field of law and needs to be verified (for instance, in the light of EU law or ECHR).

APERIO BELLA, F. (2016). Il nuovo parere precontenzioso vincolante ANAC: la tutela giustiziale nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione tra procedimento e processo. RIVISTA AIC(4/2016), 1-35.

Il nuovo parere precontenzioso vincolante ANAC: la tutela giustiziale nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione tra procedimento e processo

flaminia Aperio Bella
2016-01-01

Abstract

The essay focuses on the new pre-litigation advice of ANAC (i.e. italian public procurement Authority), from the genesis since the recent evolutions. The analysis of this non-judicial remedy offered the chance to reflect on the more general issue of the differences between administrative procedure and judicial review. Starting from the contributions of traditional scholars about administrative appeal and contentious procedure, the essay identifies formal features that structurally characterize a "process" and, according to the prospective chosen, these elements have been combined with a functional analysis. After this survey, the new binding pre-litigation advice of ANAC is identified with the category of“administrative decision”and this conclusion brings specific results in terms of rules applicables. However the essay emphasizes that the notion of “process” has different meanings in each field of law and needs to be verified (for instance, in the light of EU law or ECHR).
2016
APERIO BELLA, F. (2016). Il nuovo parere precontenzioso vincolante ANAC: la tutela giustiziale nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione tra procedimento e processo. RIVISTA AIC(4/2016), 1-35.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/325904
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact