The new nuclear history can make a critical contribution by forcing us to reconsider or reframe the theoretical premises of the concepts we apply to our understanding of the present – and with which we try to navigate the future. It bears on fundamental questions, such as: How should the US manage its alliances? Should it establish a multilateral nuclear policy dialogue in Asia? In what depth should it discuss issues of doctrine and targeting with its Asian allies? What capabilities might reassure European allies in light of current Russian revisionism? Could nuclear war be limited and controlled in an East Asian maritime arena? Do nuclear weapons strengthen an alliance, or do they introduce a divisive bone of contention? Is extended nuclear deterrence (END) stabilizing or is it on the contrary pushing the allies to ask for more? What is the relationship between nuclear and conventional forces in END credibility? How do nuclear alliances contribute to international security and international order? The lessons and insights from these papers, which look at five historical cases of US extended deterrence during the Cold War, should help us think about crucial current issues, and be of use both to historians who want to have a better understanding of the Cold War past and to policymakers who are currently grappling with these issues.
Nuti, L., & Ostermann, C. (2016). Introduction. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 39(4), 477.
NUTI, Leopoldo (Corresponding)
|Data di pubblicazione:||2016|
|Citazione:||Nuti, L., & Ostermann, C. (2016). Introduction. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 39(4), 477.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|