Based on ethnographic research on the so-called Female Genital Mutilations/FGM in Italy and in the health field, in this article the author, that adopts the term Modification/MoGf, has chosen two sketches of Self-Ethnography to criticize some international documents and, in particular, the Istanbul Convention on Gender-based Violence. Through an analysis of concepts such as culture, tradition, gender, victims and patriarchy, assumed in an antihistoric and essentialist key in these texts, the author highlights how they are the result of ‘convictions’ of a mainstream Western difference feminism and of an agreed-upon language which has helped fostering human rights of women rhetoric as moral economies. Finally, the author wants to show how these same concepts have been incorporated and strategically performed by social actors to create a transnational moral subject rather than justice subject.

Fusaschi, M. (2020). Quel genre de convictions dans les Conventions ? Esquisses d’auto-ethnographie des droits humains des femmes en tant qu’économies morales : le cas des Modifications Génitales Féminines. ARCHIVIO ANTROPOLOGICO MEDITERRANEO, 22(1/ 2020), 9-23.

Quel genre de convictions dans les Conventions ? Esquisses d’auto-ethnographie des droits humains des femmes en tant qu’économies morales : le cas des Modifications Génitales Féminines

Fusaschi
2020-01-01

Abstract

Based on ethnographic research on the so-called Female Genital Mutilations/FGM in Italy and in the health field, in this article the author, that adopts the term Modification/MoGf, has chosen two sketches of Self-Ethnography to criticize some international documents and, in particular, the Istanbul Convention on Gender-based Violence. Through an analysis of concepts such as culture, tradition, gender, victims and patriarchy, assumed in an antihistoric and essentialist key in these texts, the author highlights how they are the result of ‘convictions’ of a mainstream Western difference feminism and of an agreed-upon language which has helped fostering human rights of women rhetoric as moral economies. Finally, the author wants to show how these same concepts have been incorporated and strategically performed by social actors to create a transnational moral subject rather than justice subject.
2020
À partir d’une enquête de terrain d’une vingtaine d’années, l’auteure a choisi dans cet article, deux exercices d’auto-ethnographie en Italie dans le domaine de la santé sur le cas des soi-disant Mutilations Génitales Féminines/MGF qu’elle appelle, en expliquant pourquoi, Modifications/MoGF et en associant une critique de documents internationaux notamment, de la Convention d’Istanbul contre la violence à l’égard des femmes. À travers l’analyse de notions telles que culture, tradition, genre, victime et patriarcat, présentes dans ces textes en clé antihistorique et essentialiste, l’auteure entend souligner l’impact d’un féminisme occidental, néolibéral et différentialiste, sur ces mêmes concepts qui dès lors se donnent à lire comme le résultat de “convictions”, et d’un langage global consensuel qui participe à nourrir la rhétorique des droits humains des femmes en tant qu’économies morales. Enfin, l’auteure veut montrer comment ces mêmes concepts peuvent être incorporés et performés stratégiquement par les acteurs sociaux afin de créer un sujet moral transnational à la place d’un sujet de justice.
Fusaschi, M. (2020). Quel genre de convictions dans les Conventions ? Esquisses d’auto-ethnographie des droits humains des femmes en tant qu’économies morales : le cas des Modifications Génitales Féminines. ARCHIVIO ANTROPOLOGICO MEDITERRANEO, 22(1/ 2020), 9-23.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/362249
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact