Some recent events related to the discussion of the appeals presented by the former Members of Italian Parliament about their “pensions” suggest to deal again with domestic jurisdiction of constitutional organs and in particular of the Chambers: the consequences of the “Lorenzoni case”, at the basis of the judgements no. 120/2014 and no. 262/2017 of Italian Constitutional Court, have to be considered with peculiar attention. Even if these judgements have confirmed that domestic jurisdiction is legitimate, it should not concern relationships of constitutional organs with third parties (including former MPs, according to som
Maestri, G. (2020). Autonomia e autodichia delle Camere, tra istituti da ricalibrare e decisioni da prendere (specie in tema di “vitalizi”). FEDERALISMI.IT(10), 243-284.
Autonomia e autodichia delle Camere, tra istituti da ricalibrare e decisioni da prendere (specie in tema di “vitalizi”)
Gabriele Maestri
2020-01-01
Abstract
Some recent events related to the discussion of the appeals presented by the former Members of Italian Parliament about their “pensions” suggest to deal again with domestic jurisdiction of constitutional organs and in particular of the Chambers: the consequences of the “Lorenzoni case”, at the basis of the judgements no. 120/2014 and no. 262/2017 of Italian Constitutional Court, have to be considered with peculiar attention. Even if these judgements have confirmed that domestic jurisdiction is legitimate, it should not concern relationships of constitutional organs with third parties (including former MPs, according to somI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.