Purpose: The study aims to explore the interplay between open innovation and intellectual property. Differently from previous studies, we argue that open innovation fosters firm’s patenting activity. Design/methodology/approach: We use linear regression analysis to test model’s hypotheses. Data are drawn from the Eurostat statistics and refer to a large sample of European firms (NACE Rev.2) Findings: The findings confirm that open innovation fosters patenting activity in health care, also thanks to huge governments’ expenditures in this market. Research limitations/implications: The study focuses solely on European firms and it adopts a traditional linear approach. So, we cannot exclude that different dynamics may occur across European borders. Future research should address this concern by focusing on multi-country comparative studies. Practical implications: Open innovation is the most suitable model for health industry, because it improves both innovation performance and intellectual capital of firms. Originality/value: The study tackles an existing gap of the literature by considering how the presence of large customers impacts the strength of intellectual property protection.

Orlando, B., Ballestra, L.V., Magni, D., Ciampi, F. (2020). Open Innovation and Patenting activities in health care. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL [10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0076].

Open Innovation and Patenting activities in health care

Magni, D.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to explore the interplay between open innovation and intellectual property. Differently from previous studies, we argue that open innovation fosters firm’s patenting activity. Design/methodology/approach: We use linear regression analysis to test model’s hypotheses. Data are drawn from the Eurostat statistics and refer to a large sample of European firms (NACE Rev.2) Findings: The findings confirm that open innovation fosters patenting activity in health care, also thanks to huge governments’ expenditures in this market. Research limitations/implications: The study focuses solely on European firms and it adopts a traditional linear approach. So, we cannot exclude that different dynamics may occur across European borders. Future research should address this concern by focusing on multi-country comparative studies. Practical implications: Open innovation is the most suitable model for health industry, because it improves both innovation performance and intellectual capital of firms. Originality/value: The study tackles an existing gap of the literature by considering how the presence of large customers impacts the strength of intellectual property protection.
2020
Orlando, B., Ballestra, L.V., Magni, D., Ciampi, F. (2020). Open Innovation and Patenting activities in health care. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL [10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0076].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/369526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact