Predictability and predictive justice as an opportunity to foresee the judicial proceedings’ outputs, taking into account all the risks related to the use of automated decision-makings. The study is based on a question: is the judge replaceable by a robot? The adopted approach aims at asserting that the robo-decisions and the humans’ ones may be affected by misstatements and the automated decisionmakings may not be regarded as “fair”, even if they seem to be logically “correct”: indeed, no algorithmic systems is infallible.
Battelli, E. (2020). Giustizia predittiva decisione robotica e ruolo del giudice. GIUSTIZIA CIVILE(2), 281-319.
Giustizia predittiva decisione robotica e ruolo del giudice
BATTELLI E.
2020-01-01
Abstract
Predictability and predictive justice as an opportunity to foresee the judicial proceedings’ outputs, taking into account all the risks related to the use of automated decision-makings. The study is based on a question: is the judge replaceable by a robot? The adopted approach aims at asserting that the robo-decisions and the humans’ ones may be affected by misstatements and the automated decisionmakings may not be regarded as “fair”, even if they seem to be logically “correct”: indeed, no algorithmic systems is infallible.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
