The analysis carried out by the Supreme Court appears to be only partly acceptable because the conclusions expressed do not comply with the specific regulation. The interpretation of the Supreme Court entails an unnecessary limitation of the category of the rural activities for cadastral purposes, and so a limitation of the cases when the building may be deemed rural, besides the fact that it determines an excessive dynamism in the qualification of rurality given to the building. In fact, the Court of Cassation does not connect this qualification just to the objective features of the property and to the activity of the farming enterprise for which it is intended, but it also considers parameters linked to the relevant income which is not durable over time and is reasonably subject to continuous changes. Such parameters, therefore, are difficult to be assessed for the cadastre. This, in fact, stands out both for being strictly linked to the featur es of the building and for its temporal stability .
L’analisi compiuta dalla Suprema Corte appare solo in parte condivisibile in quanto le conclusioni espresse non trovano aderenza alla normativa di settore. L’interpretazione offerta dal giudice di vertice conduce ad un’ingiustificata limitazione del novero delle attività agricole ai fini catastali e, quindi, dei casi in cui il cespite strumentale possa essere considerato rurale, oltre a determinare un’eccessiva dinamicità della qualifica della ruralità attribuita al fabbricato. Infatti la Corte di Cassazione non collega detta qualifica solamente alle caratteristiche oggettive dell’immobile e all’attività dell’impresa agricola cui è destinato, ma ritiene rilevanti anche parametri reddituali non durevoli nel tempo e ragionevolmente soggetti a continuo mutamento, che, dunque, risultano di difficile ausilio ai fini dell’accertamento catastale. Quest’ultimo, infatti, si distingue ontologicamente sia per essere strettamente legato alle caratteristiche dell’immobile, sia per la sua stabilità temporale.
Girelli, G. (2021). La ruralità dei fabbricati strumentali all’esercizio dell’impresa agricola. RIVISTA DI DIRITTO TRIBUTARIO, XXXI(n. 1 - Febbraio 2021), 8-27.
La ruralità dei fabbricati strumentali all’esercizio dell’impresa agricola
giovanni girelli
2021-01-01
Abstract
The analysis carried out by the Supreme Court appears to be only partly acceptable because the conclusions expressed do not comply with the specific regulation. The interpretation of the Supreme Court entails an unnecessary limitation of the category of the rural activities for cadastral purposes, and so a limitation of the cases when the building may be deemed rural, besides the fact that it determines an excessive dynamism in the qualification of rurality given to the building. In fact, the Court of Cassation does not connect this qualification just to the objective features of the property and to the activity of the farming enterprise for which it is intended, but it also considers parameters linked to the relevant income which is not durable over time and is reasonably subject to continuous changes. Such parameters, therefore, are difficult to be assessed for the cadastre. This, in fact, stands out both for being strictly linked to the featur es of the building and for its temporal stability .I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.