An extensive and updated review of 223 values about the embodied energy and carbon of building insulation materials, mainly retrieved from 156 Environmental Product Declarations, is proposed with attention to innovative and emerging insulation materials. Comparative analyses were carried out thanks to the adoption of the same functional unit (1 m2 with a thermal resistance of 1m2K/W and a design life span of 50 years) to assess the consistence of reference values and the main sources of variability. The comparison suffers from many uncertainties and variance decomposition was employed to verify the main drivers of variability in the dataset elaborated. Data about traditional insulation materials show the lowest ranges of variation when reported per functional unit while the definition of reference values for innovative and unconventional insulation materials was quite difficult due to the low values found and their high variance. Traditional inorganic insulation materials exhibit competitive embodied impacts (glass wool: 16–31 MJ/FU and 0.6–1.2 kg CO2eq/FU; stone wool: 21–66 MJ/FU and 1.4–4.2 kg CO2eq/FU) if compared with fossil fuel derived (EPS: 44–78 MJ/FU and 1.9–3.5 kg CO2eq/FU) or many emerging super-insulating solutions (aerogel: 251–372 MJ/FU and 11.6–18.7 kg CO2eq/FU). Density is an important variability carrier for glass wool, stone wool, and EPS

Asdrubali, F., Grazieschi, G., Thomas, G. (2021). Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials: A critical review. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2 [10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100032].

Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials: A critical review

Francesco Asdrubali;gianluca Grazieschi
;
2021

Abstract

An extensive and updated review of 223 values about the embodied energy and carbon of building insulation materials, mainly retrieved from 156 Environmental Product Declarations, is proposed with attention to innovative and emerging insulation materials. Comparative analyses were carried out thanks to the adoption of the same functional unit (1 m2 with a thermal resistance of 1m2K/W and a design life span of 50 years) to assess the consistence of reference values and the main sources of variability. The comparison suffers from many uncertainties and variance decomposition was employed to verify the main drivers of variability in the dataset elaborated. Data about traditional insulation materials show the lowest ranges of variation when reported per functional unit while the definition of reference values for innovative and unconventional insulation materials was quite difficult due to the low values found and their high variance. Traditional inorganic insulation materials exhibit competitive embodied impacts (glass wool: 16–31 MJ/FU and 0.6–1.2 kg CO2eq/FU; stone wool: 21–66 MJ/FU and 1.4–4.2 kg CO2eq/FU) if compared with fossil fuel derived (EPS: 44–78 MJ/FU and 1.9–3.5 kg CO2eq/FU) or many emerging super-insulating solutions (aerogel: 251–372 MJ/FU and 11.6–18.7 kg CO2eq/FU). Density is an important variability carrier for glass wool, stone wool, and EPS
Asdrubali, F., Grazieschi, G., Thomas, G. (2021). Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials: A critical review. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2 [10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100032].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2666789421000246-main (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 3.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11590/400979
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact