Controversies over the acceptability of male circumcision (MC) are not new to the international bioethical community. I do not expect to add much to the arguments or evidence presented elsewhere, but I want to acknowledge the often-overlooked political element in which the debate is entrenched. In fairness to those sympathetic to the circumcision ban, I will first introduce some supportive arguments to their position. Next, I will show the limits of those critiques, affirming that MC should not be outlawed in any liberal country, but that its permissibility only be evaluated within its medico-ethical dimension without the political charge often associated with the issue.
Garasic, M.D. (2013). In defence of male circumcision. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 31(1), 60-69 [10.1007/BF03351343].
Titolo: | In defence of male circumcision | |
Autori: | ||
Data di pubblicazione: | 2013 | |
Rivista: | ||
Citazione: | Garasic, M.D. (2013). In defence of male circumcision. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 31(1), 60-69 [10.1007/BF03351343]. | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11590/402461 | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |