The study of fossil coastlines is one of the most widely used methods to unravel the vertical movements of the Earth’s solid surface. All along the coast of the Calabrian Subduction Arc, well preserved Pleistocene marine terrace sequences document a protracted uplift history. Although Pleistocene vertical movements have been extensively explored, the Holocene history is not well understood. Numerous uplifted coastlines of the Holocene period have been studied along the Tyrrhenian side of Calabria, but the Ionian coastal sector is considerably under-studied. Our new data from the coast of the Crotone Peninsula fill this crucial data-gap. AMS 14C dating of seventeen sea level markers, elevated above the current mean sea level, show ages between 2300 and 7000 Cal. Yr BP. The elevation of the markers was corrected for the paleo sea level using the most updated GIA models ICE- 6G (VM5a) and ICE-7G (VM7). We found that a coastline dated to 7 ka shows uplift rates of 0.8 mm/yr, consistent with late Pleistocene uplift rates (ca. 0.8 mm/yr). In contrast, a 2.3 ka coastline was uplifted by only 1 m, resulting in lower uplift rates of ca. 0.5 mm/yr. However, there are clues that the abandonment of this younger coastline may have occurred with a rapid uplift pulse. Reconstructing the past vertical movements of the Crotone Peninsula reveals an unsteady uplift history. At some times fast uplift rates are required, while for other periods, lasting as long as 3–4 kyr, the uplift rate is slower or zero. An uplift history consisting of periods of accelerated uplift, or even coseismic pulses, would also explain the difference in uplift rates between short term (minor than 5 ka) and long term (major than 5 ka) markers through a metric we have defined as uplift rate sensitivity. Understanding the details of this uplift history has social relevance. The co-seismic uplift hypothesis requires further investigation but if confirmed would likely affect the seismic and tsunami hazard of the Crotone Peninsula. Similarly, the unsteady uplift rate would cause a risk given the current rapid rate of global sea level rise. Periods of sustained vertical stability would increase the risk of flooding even in areas characterized by long-term uplift and thus considered safe.
Liberatore, M., Gliozzi, E., Cipollari, P., Cosentino, D. (2023). Holocene vertical velocity fields in the Calabrian Arc (southern Italy): New insights from uplifted sea-level markers in the Crotone Peninsula. QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 321 [10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108368].
Holocene vertical velocity fields in the Calabrian Arc (southern Italy): New insights from uplifted sea-level markers in the Crotone Peninsula
Liberatore, Marco
;Gliozzi, Elsa;Cipollari, Paola;Cosentino, Domenico
2023-01-01
Abstract
The study of fossil coastlines is one of the most widely used methods to unravel the vertical movements of the Earth’s solid surface. All along the coast of the Calabrian Subduction Arc, well preserved Pleistocene marine terrace sequences document a protracted uplift history. Although Pleistocene vertical movements have been extensively explored, the Holocene history is not well understood. Numerous uplifted coastlines of the Holocene period have been studied along the Tyrrhenian side of Calabria, but the Ionian coastal sector is considerably under-studied. Our new data from the coast of the Crotone Peninsula fill this crucial data-gap. AMS 14C dating of seventeen sea level markers, elevated above the current mean sea level, show ages between 2300 and 7000 Cal. Yr BP. The elevation of the markers was corrected for the paleo sea level using the most updated GIA models ICE- 6G (VM5a) and ICE-7G (VM7). We found that a coastline dated to 7 ka shows uplift rates of 0.8 mm/yr, consistent with late Pleistocene uplift rates (ca. 0.8 mm/yr). In contrast, a 2.3 ka coastline was uplifted by only 1 m, resulting in lower uplift rates of ca. 0.5 mm/yr. However, there are clues that the abandonment of this younger coastline may have occurred with a rapid uplift pulse. Reconstructing the past vertical movements of the Crotone Peninsula reveals an unsteady uplift history. At some times fast uplift rates are required, while for other periods, lasting as long as 3–4 kyr, the uplift rate is slower or zero. An uplift history consisting of periods of accelerated uplift, or even coseismic pulses, would also explain the difference in uplift rates between short term (minor than 5 ka) and long term (major than 5 ka) markers through a metric we have defined as uplift rate sensitivity. Understanding the details of this uplift history has social relevance. The co-seismic uplift hypothesis requires further investigation but if confirmed would likely affect the seismic and tsunami hazard of the Crotone Peninsula. Similarly, the unsteady uplift rate would cause a risk given the current rapid rate of global sea level rise. Periods of sustained vertical stability would increase the risk of flooding even in areas characterized by long-term uplift and thus considered safe.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.