In the Old English homiletic tradition, the apocryphal material concerning the struggle between Peter and Simon Magus offers a useful paradigm for representing the boundary between miracle and magic. Drawing mainly from the codification proposed in the Passio sanctorum apostolorum Petri et Pauli, the anonymous author of the Blickling Homily XV, Ælfric and Wulfstan exploit the unstable fluidity of a narrative that can be infinitely expanded or narrowed through additions and subtractions of episodes and dialogues, in rewriting their homilies. "e article aims to identify the significant elements that highlight the different attitudes assumed by the three homileticians with respect to the subject matter, from the simple translation of the Blickling Homily to Ælfric’s reworking to Wulfstan’s exemplum.
Riviello, C. (2023). Pietro e Simon Mago sul confine tra miracolo e magia nelle omelie in inglese antico. LEA, 12, 339-359 [10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14921].
Pietro e Simon Mago sul confine tra miracolo e magia nelle omelie in inglese antico
Carla Riviello
2023-01-01
Abstract
In the Old English homiletic tradition, the apocryphal material concerning the struggle between Peter and Simon Magus offers a useful paradigm for representing the boundary between miracle and magic. Drawing mainly from the codification proposed in the Passio sanctorum apostolorum Petri et Pauli, the anonymous author of the Blickling Homily XV, Ælfric and Wulfstan exploit the unstable fluidity of a narrative that can be infinitely expanded or narrowed through additions and subtractions of episodes and dialogues, in rewriting their homilies. "e article aims to identify the significant elements that highlight the different attitudes assumed by the three homileticians with respect to the subject matter, from the simple translation of the Blickling Homily to Ælfric’s reworking to Wulfstan’s exemplum.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.