The two freshwater plants Ludwigia hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis, invasive in Europe including Italy, can colonise aquatic and bank habitats and possess remarkable morphological plasticity. They can be distinguished mainly by floral characters, while in the vegetative phase they show morphological similarities, making their identification difficult. In some cases, incorrect identification of these species generated confusion in the reference literature. This study aimed to define the morphological differences between L. hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis to provide an identification key for these two species even when not flowering. Morphological quantitative and qualitative characters of 138 samples were measured and evaluated. PCA was performed, and each character was compared between the two species in each morphotype. The two species showed significant differences between morphological vegetative characters. Ludwigia hexapetala is associated with longer leaf length/width ratio, matte leaves with no petiole, erect rough stems when flowering, and high frequency of pneumatophore production. Conversely, L. peploides subsp. montevidensis is associated with shorter leaf length/width ratio, shiny leaves with a distinguishable petiole, and creeping, sticky stems. Our morphological study provides a taxonomic identification key for L. hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis, allowing accurate identification even in the vegetative phase.
Pelella, E., Ceschin, S. (2024). A morphological investigation of the alien Ludwigia species in Italy: towards a new key for unambiguous identification. PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 1-9 [10.1080/11263504.2024.2421223].
A morphological investigation of the alien Ludwigia species in Italy: towards a new key for unambiguous identification
Pelella, Emanuele
;Ceschin, Simona
2024-01-01
Abstract
The two freshwater plants Ludwigia hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis, invasive in Europe including Italy, can colonise aquatic and bank habitats and possess remarkable morphological plasticity. They can be distinguished mainly by floral characters, while in the vegetative phase they show morphological similarities, making their identification difficult. In some cases, incorrect identification of these species generated confusion in the reference literature. This study aimed to define the morphological differences between L. hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis to provide an identification key for these two species even when not flowering. Morphological quantitative and qualitative characters of 138 samples were measured and evaluated. PCA was performed, and each character was compared between the two species in each morphotype. The two species showed significant differences between morphological vegetative characters. Ludwigia hexapetala is associated with longer leaf length/width ratio, matte leaves with no petiole, erect rough stems when flowering, and high frequency of pneumatophore production. Conversely, L. peploides subsp. montevidensis is associated with shorter leaf length/width ratio, shiny leaves with a distinguishable petiole, and creeping, sticky stems. Our morphological study provides a taxonomic identification key for L. hexapetala and L. peploides subsp. montevidensis, allowing accurate identification even in the vegetative phase.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.