The paper aims to probe the rhetoric patterns featuring self-talk in the mediascape, with particular reference to the new forms of “public” soliloquy. To the fore is the rhetoric analysis carried out by Erving Goffman in Forms of Talk (1981), focusing on the conversational frames in which social actors develop their communicative actions: “with self-talk, then, one might want to say that a sort of impersonation is occurring”. Self-talk is not only a dramatic genre or religious practice, it is also a public conversational habit, as digital speeches or sermons confirm. According to Goffman, self-talk can be intended as “the stage-acting of a version of the delivery, albeit only vaguely a version of its reception” (Goffman, 1981, p. 83). Thus, it is possible to investigate self-talk as a conversational medium, practiced not only in the theatre or in the church, but also on the Internet and television. The purpose is to understand what kind of self-talks are most commonly diffused in daily life, assuming that “here is a crucial feature of human communication” (Goffman, 1981, p. 84). Specifically, the methodology concerns Goffman’s frame analysis of self-talk, in reference to the rhetoric processes of “exaggeration, stereotyping, standardization of intensity” (Goffman, 1981, p. 84) of public speeches. This theoretic approach allows an emphasis on the convergence between sociology and communication in the analysis of self-talk, which can be paradoxically considered as a communicative strategy both in public and in private. Thanks to Goffman’s analysis, soliloquy and public sermons can be considered relevant forms of contemporary self-talk, inspired by meaningful rhetorical patterns

Lombardinilo, A. (2022). Mainstream soliloquies: Goffman and the sociology of self. MEDIASCAPES JOURNAL(19/2022), 165-176.

Mainstream soliloquies: Goffman and the sociology of self

Andrea Lombardinilo
2022-01-01

Abstract

The paper aims to probe the rhetoric patterns featuring self-talk in the mediascape, with particular reference to the new forms of “public” soliloquy. To the fore is the rhetoric analysis carried out by Erving Goffman in Forms of Talk (1981), focusing on the conversational frames in which social actors develop their communicative actions: “with self-talk, then, one might want to say that a sort of impersonation is occurring”. Self-talk is not only a dramatic genre or religious practice, it is also a public conversational habit, as digital speeches or sermons confirm. According to Goffman, self-talk can be intended as “the stage-acting of a version of the delivery, albeit only vaguely a version of its reception” (Goffman, 1981, p. 83). Thus, it is possible to investigate self-talk as a conversational medium, practiced not only in the theatre or in the church, but also on the Internet and television. The purpose is to understand what kind of self-talks are most commonly diffused in daily life, assuming that “here is a crucial feature of human communication” (Goffman, 1981, p. 84). Specifically, the methodology concerns Goffman’s frame analysis of self-talk, in reference to the rhetoric processes of “exaggeration, stereotyping, standardization of intensity” (Goffman, 1981, p. 84) of public speeches. This theoretic approach allows an emphasis on the convergence between sociology and communication in the analysis of self-talk, which can be paradoxically considered as a communicative strategy both in public and in private. Thanks to Goffman’s analysis, soliloquy and public sermons can be considered relevant forms of contemporary self-talk, inspired by meaningful rhetorical patterns
2022
Lombardinilo, A. (2022). Mainstream soliloquies: Goffman and the sociology of self. MEDIASCAPES JOURNAL(19/2022), 165-176.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/492144
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact