The goal of this paper is to focus on the heuristic paradigms of the social imaginary of flâneur starting from the considerations fostered in the essay Metropolis and the life of spirit by Simmel. His considerations inspired both Benjamin’s reflections on the flâneur and the analysis of media society outlined by Flaiano as a “customary flâneur”. Hence follows the representation of flâneur as an emotive consequence of the urban sociability as well as a result of the objective hypertrophy of metropolis and incarnation of one of the possible experiential paradigms of modernity. Therefore, the perspective of research is to probe the sociological influence gained by the figure of the flâneur throughout the twentieth century, in accordance with the innovation of communicative practices. To the fore is the significant role played by the informative dimension in the construction of the social imaginary of flâneur: “The replacement of the older relation by information, and of information by sensation, reflects the increasing atrophy of experience”. The replacement and interchangeability of conversational experiences can fuel the flâneur’s dismay before the spectacle society, suspended between narrative fluctuations and semiotic insights. These factors lead up to the collective imaginary of flâneur as a potential Hidden King of modernity and a probable interpretative paradigm of the objectual hypertrophy of our times. The latter was observed and analyzed by Simmel prior to the advent of the liquid society.
Lombardinilo, A. (2018). Simmel, Benjamin e l’immaginario del flâneur: note sull’ “atrofia progressiva dell’esperienza”. MEDIASCAPES JOURNAL(18), 5-17.
Simmel, Benjamin e l’immaginario del flâneur: note sull’ “atrofia progressiva dell’esperienza”
Lombardinilo
2018-01-01
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to focus on the heuristic paradigms of the social imaginary of flâneur starting from the considerations fostered in the essay Metropolis and the life of spirit by Simmel. His considerations inspired both Benjamin’s reflections on the flâneur and the analysis of media society outlined by Flaiano as a “customary flâneur”. Hence follows the representation of flâneur as an emotive consequence of the urban sociability as well as a result of the objective hypertrophy of metropolis and incarnation of one of the possible experiential paradigms of modernity. Therefore, the perspective of research is to probe the sociological influence gained by the figure of the flâneur throughout the twentieth century, in accordance with the innovation of communicative practices. To the fore is the significant role played by the informative dimension in the construction of the social imaginary of flâneur: “The replacement of the older relation by information, and of information by sensation, reflects the increasing atrophy of experience”. The replacement and interchangeability of conversational experiences can fuel the flâneur’s dismay before the spectacle society, suspended between narrative fluctuations and semiotic insights. These factors lead up to the collective imaginary of flâneur as a potential Hidden King of modernity and a probable interpretative paradigm of the objectual hypertrophy of our times. The latter was observed and analyzed by Simmel prior to the advent of the liquid society.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.