The Use of the Project After the End of the Modern Project

Modernity has inextricably linked the idea of the project to the temporal dimension of the future. However, today the future is per-ceived as a dimension that is already exhausted in the present, either as the consummation of all novelty or as the threat of a catastrophic outcome. One thus ends up living in a kind of eternal present, which, referring to Reinhart Koselleck, is configured as a “space of expectations” without a time horizon. Such questions cannot but call into question architecture, which has made the project one of its fundamental categories. A geneal-ogy of the architectural project is then proposed as it is connected to the political project, which already finds a spatial connotation in Plato, and “void” is identified as that concept from which different modes of pro-jectuality are determined. It follows that, in today’s ascertained end of the modern project, the possibility of a different conception of the proj-ect opens up, one that is not defined as an alternative to use as modernity intended, but rather is shaped from use itself, so that the present space of expectation can disclose its own horizon of the future.