The story of what has intellectually united, and divided, Croce and Huizinga, two of the most distinguished thinkers of the first half of the twentieth century, is the story of a “missed relationship”. The landscape within which the reasons for this apparent lack of mutual recognition become intelligible is philosophical in character. In this respect, their different conceptions of historicism play a decisive role. In a meta-critical fashion, this essay seeks to explore the theoretical and the existential significance of a striking intellectual silence.

Maiolo, F. (2025). Croce e Huizinga: un rapporto mancato. LOGOS, 19, 123-133.

Croce e Huizinga: un rapporto mancato

Francesco Maiolo
2025-01-01

Abstract

The story of what has intellectually united, and divided, Croce and Huizinga, two of the most distinguished thinkers of the first half of the twentieth century, is the story of a “missed relationship”. The landscape within which the reasons for this apparent lack of mutual recognition become intelligible is philosophical in character. In this respect, their different conceptions of historicism play a decisive role. In a meta-critical fashion, this essay seeks to explore the theoretical and the existential significance of a striking intellectual silence.
2025
Maiolo, F. (2025). Croce e Huizinga: un rapporto mancato. LOGOS, 19, 123-133.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/505037
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact