The article “From the People-Subject to the Antagonistic Subject” by Dario Gentili reconstructs the trajectory ofItalian Marxism through three decisive moments: Gramsci’s humanist historicism, Galvano Della Volpe’s scientific materialism, and Mario Tronti’s operaismo turn. Gentili examines how Gramsci’s interpretation, consolidated by Togliatti, embedded Marxism in the Italian idealist tradition by promoting the people as the political subject. Della Volpe breaks from this by advocating a scientific-materialist reading of Marx, free from Hegelian mediation. Tronti radicalizes this move by centering theory on the working class as an antagonistic subject, opposing both the concept of “people” and the logic of synthesis. The modern factory becomes the privileged site of class conflict and the production of workers’ knowledge. With the decline of Fordism, Tronti revises his theory, exposing the limits of operaismo and traditional revolutionary politics. Gentili argues that the true legacy of this tradition lies in affirming antagonism as irreconcilable separation, rather than conciliatory synthesis.

Gentili, D. (2025). Do sujeito-povo ao sujeito antagonista. (DES)TROÇOS, 6(2), 1-29 [10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.59534].

Do sujeito-povo ao sujeito antagonista

Dario Gentili
2025-01-01

Abstract

The article “From the People-Subject to the Antagonistic Subject” by Dario Gentili reconstructs the trajectory ofItalian Marxism through three decisive moments: Gramsci’s humanist historicism, Galvano Della Volpe’s scientific materialism, and Mario Tronti’s operaismo turn. Gentili examines how Gramsci’s interpretation, consolidated by Togliatti, embedded Marxism in the Italian idealist tradition by promoting the people as the political subject. Della Volpe breaks from this by advocating a scientific-materialist reading of Marx, free from Hegelian mediation. Tronti radicalizes this move by centering theory on the working class as an antagonistic subject, opposing both the concept of “people” and the logic of synthesis. The modern factory becomes the privileged site of class conflict and the production of workers’ knowledge. With the decline of Fordism, Tronti revises his theory, exposing the limits of operaismo and traditional revolutionary politics. Gentili argues that the true legacy of this tradition lies in affirming antagonism as irreconcilable separation, rather than conciliatory synthesis.
2025
Gentili, D. (2025). Do sujeito-povo ao sujeito antagonista. (DES)TROÇOS, 6(2), 1-29 [10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.59534].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/518800
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact