Counterterrorism as an instrument of normalization in foreign policy: Sudan and Algeria in the Global War on Terror

The Global War on Terror (GWOT), launched by the United States in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, presented countries all over the world with threats and opportunities, and each one tried to adapt to the situation and exploit it to its own advantage. Apparently, the choice was clear: either stand with Washington or against it. What we argue in this paper, through a comparison between the Algerian and Sudanese case, is that before 9/11 counterterrorism had already become a common ground for cooperation between the U.S. and regimes it deemed “untouchable” in the 1990s. The GWOT accelerated and intensified this trend, but this didn’t result – at least for the case considered – into new strategic partnership, due to domestic “red lines” on both parts, enduring mistrust and path-dependence from traditional regional alliances.