This article aims to highlight how the control and government of the peripheral islands – particularly the Pontine Islands – represented for the Kingdom of Naples not a sporadic concern, but a constant interest, which intensified under the Bourbons. In this process, certain dynamics may be identified, such as the role played by the various actors. During an initial phase covering the 16th and 17th centuries, the impetus was exogenous and interests were linked exclusively to the control of the territory, while economic interests linked to fishing and the coral trade were very limited. During a second phase extending throughout the 18th century, new local and informal actors emerged, giving concrete form to external impulses. These different processes, from both a synchronic and diachronic perspective, are not limited to the insular issue or the tension between centre and periphery, but give rise to broader phenomena throughout the Tyrrhenian and western Mediterranean, reflecting the presence of complex networks of inter-island relations.

Gallia, A. (2026). Peupler pour défendre : les îles Pontines, rempart maritime septentrional du royaume de Naples (1734-1815). DIX-HUITIÈME SIÈCLE, 58, 229-246.

Peupler pour défendre : les îles Pontines, rempart maritime septentrional du royaume de Naples (1734-1815)

Arturo Gallia
2026-01-01

Abstract

This article aims to highlight how the control and government of the peripheral islands – particularly the Pontine Islands – represented for the Kingdom of Naples not a sporadic concern, but a constant interest, which intensified under the Bourbons. In this process, certain dynamics may be identified, such as the role played by the various actors. During an initial phase covering the 16th and 17th centuries, the impetus was exogenous and interests were linked exclusively to the control of the territory, while economic interests linked to fishing and the coral trade were very limited. During a second phase extending throughout the 18th century, new local and informal actors emerged, giving concrete form to external impulses. These different processes, from both a synchronic and diachronic perspective, are not limited to the insular issue or the tension between centre and periphery, but give rise to broader phenomena throughout the Tyrrhenian and western Mediterranean, reflecting the presence of complex networks of inter-island relations.
2026
Cet article vise à mettre en évidence la manière dont le contrôle et le gouvernement des périphéries insulaires – les îles Pontines en particulier – ont représenté pour le royaume de Naples non pas une préoccupation sporadique, mais un intérêt constant, qui s’est intensifié sous les Bourbons. Dans ce processus, il est possible de pointer certaines dynamiques, à commencer par le rôle joué par les différents acteurs. Au cours d’une première phase couvrant les 16e et 17e siècles, les impulsions étaient d’origine exogène et les intérêts politiques liés exclusivement au contrôle du territoire, tandis que les intérêts économiques liés à la pêche et au commerce du corail étaient très limités. Au cours d’une deuxième phase s’étendant sur le 18e siècle, on assiste à l’avènement de nouveaux acteurs, locaux et informels, qui concrétisent les impulsions extérieures. Ces différents processus, dans une perspective tant synchronique que diachronique, ne se limitent pas à la seule dimension insulaire ou à la tension centre-périphérie, mais donnent lieu à des phénomènes plus larges dans l’ensemble de la Méditerranée tyrrhénienne et occidentale, témoignant de la présence de réseaux articulés et complexes de relations interinsulaires.
Gallia, A. (2026). Peupler pour défendre : les îles Pontines, rempart maritime septentrional du royaume de Naples (1734-1815). DIX-HUITIÈME SIÈCLE, 58, 229-246.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/550256
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact