Existing reinforced concrete frame buildings with non-ductile detailing suffered severe damage and caused loss of life during earthquakes. Different rehabilitation systems have been developed to upgrade the seismic performance of this kind of structures: in particular, buckling restrained steel braces (BRB) offer many advantages. BRB differs from a conventional brace in that it is capable of yielding both in tension and compression instead of buckling thus exhibiting very favorable energy-dissipating characteristics. The present paper deals with the seismic protection of reinforced concrete frames. In particular a displacement-based procedure to design dissipative BRB for the seismic protection of masonry-infilled frames is proposed. A two-fold performance objective is considered to protect the structure against the collapse (ULS) and the non-structural damage (DLS) by limiting global displacements and interstorey drifts so that structural and infill integrity is granted under a given seismic event. Positioning these devices in a structure to maximize their effectiveness at minimum cost is a very important issue which is considered too. As an example, an infilled-frame building, designed according to the non-seismic Italian Code and thus only for vertical loads, is analyzed. After retrofitting with BRB via the proposed procedure, non linear static and dynamic time-history analyses to assess the effectiveness of the proposed rehabilitation design procedure are performed.

Albanesi, T., Bergami, A.V., Nuti, C. (2008). Un criterio di progetto per il rinforzo di telai in c.a. mediante controventi dissipativi. In 17° Congresso CTE Roma 2008.

Un criterio di progetto per il rinforzo di telai in c.a. mediante controventi dissipativi

ALBANESI, Tommaso;BERGAMI, ALESSANDRO VITTORIO;NUTI, CAMILLO
2008-01-01

Abstract

Existing reinforced concrete frame buildings with non-ductile detailing suffered severe damage and caused loss of life during earthquakes. Different rehabilitation systems have been developed to upgrade the seismic performance of this kind of structures: in particular, buckling restrained steel braces (BRB) offer many advantages. BRB differs from a conventional brace in that it is capable of yielding both in tension and compression instead of buckling thus exhibiting very favorable energy-dissipating characteristics. The present paper deals with the seismic protection of reinforced concrete frames. In particular a displacement-based procedure to design dissipative BRB for the seismic protection of masonry-infilled frames is proposed. A two-fold performance objective is considered to protect the structure against the collapse (ULS) and the non-structural damage (DLS) by limiting global displacements and interstorey drifts so that structural and infill integrity is granted under a given seismic event. Positioning these devices in a structure to maximize their effectiveness at minimum cost is a very important issue which is considered too. As an example, an infilled-frame building, designed according to the non-seismic Italian Code and thus only for vertical loads, is analyzed. After retrofitting with BRB via the proposed procedure, non linear static and dynamic time-history analyses to assess the effectiveness of the proposed rehabilitation design procedure are performed.
2008
Albanesi, T., Bergami, A.V., Nuti, C. (2008). Un criterio di progetto per il rinforzo di telai in c.a. mediante controventi dissipativi. In 17° Congresso CTE Roma 2008.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/174459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact