How Much Can We Trust the Electromechanical Delay Estimated by Using Electromyography?

Conforto, Silvia; Mathieu, Pa; Schmid, Maurizio; Bibbo, Daniele; Florestal, Jr; D'Alessio, T.

doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259335

Benvenuti nell'Anagrafe della Ricerca d'Ateneo

La valutazione delle attività di ricerca che si svolgono nelle università ha assunto un'importanza rilevante sia per l'intero sistema universitario sia all'interno di ogni singolo ateneo. Roma Tre si è quindi dotata di idonei strumenti informativi in grado di supportare al meglio le azioni di monitoraggio e di valutazione delle attività di ricerca svolte nei propri dipartimentied ha realizzato una Anagrafe della Ricerca di Ateneo.

In this paper different estimation techniques are evaluated for the assessment of electromechanical delay (EMD). The following techniques are compared for benchmarking purposes: envelope estimation and thresholding, with different subjective combinations of filters and thresholds, and a double threshold statistical detector (DTD). Performances are compared in terms of bias, standard deviation and erroneous detections of the estimations. DTD showed higher robustness and repeatability of results, guaranteed by the objective settings based on the statistical characteristics of the algorithm.

In this paper different estimation techniques are evaluated for the assessment of Electromechanical Delay (EMD). The following techniques are compared for benchmarking purposes: envelope estimation and thresholding, with different subjective combinations of filters and thresholds, and a double threshold statistical detector (DTD). Performance are compared in terms of bias, standard deviation and erroneous detections of the estimations. DTD showed higher robustness and repeatability of results, guaranteed by the objective settings based on the statistical characteristics of the algorithm.

Conforto, S., Mathieu, P.a., Schmid, M., Bibbo, D., Florestal, J.r., & D'Alessio, T. (2006). How Much Can We Trust the Electromechanical Delay Estimated by Using Electromyography?. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings (pp.1256-1259). NEW YORK : IEEE [10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259335].

Titolo:	How Much Can We Trust the Electromechanical Delay Estimated by Using Electromyography?
Autori:	CONFORTO, SILVIA MATHIEU PA SCHMID, Maurizio BIBBO, DANIELE FLORESTAL JR D'ALESSIO T. mostra contributor esterni nascondi contributor esterni
Data di pubblicazione:	2006
Rivista:	IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY ... ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Citazione:	Conforto, S., Mathieu, P.a., Schmid, M., Bibbo, D., Florestal, J.r., & D'Alessio, T. (2006). How Much Can We Trust the Electromechanical Delay Estimated by Using Electromyography?. In Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings (pp.1256-1259). NEW YORK : IEEE [10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259335].
Abstract:	In this paper different estimation techniques are evaluated for the assessment of electromechanical delay (EMD). The following techniques are compared for benchmarking purposes: envelope estimation and thresholding, with different subjective combinations of filters and thresholds, and a double threshold statistical detector (DTD). Performances are compared in terms of bias, standard deviation and erroneous detections of the estimations. DTD showed higher robustness and repeatability of results, guaranteed by the objective settings based on the statistical characteristics of the algorithm.
Handle:	http://hdl.handle.net/11590/176074
ISBN:	978-1-4244-0032-4
Appare nelle tipologie:	4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno

File in questo prodotto:

Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
http://hdl.handle.net/11590/176074

Citazioni

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.