A comparison between the most suitable routing protocols for WSNs applied in wide agriculture scenarios is shown. The protocols, already present in literature, have been conceived to better manage the power budget of the nodes and are particularly suitable to cover the energy issues that wide agriculture scenario can request. This study aims to indicate which of the protocols eligible for this scenario is the most suitable. Comparative simulation test will be shown.

Cagnetti, M., Leccisi, M., Leccese, F. (2020). Reliability comparison of routing protocols for WSNs in wide agriculture scenarios by means of ηl index. In SENSORNETS 2020 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sensor Networks (pp.169-176). SciTePress [10.5220/0009365401690176].

Reliability comparison of routing protocols for WSNs in wide agriculture scenarios by means of ηl index

Cagnetti M.;Leccisi M.;Leccese F.
2020-01-01

Abstract

A comparison between the most suitable routing protocols for WSNs applied in wide agriculture scenarios is shown. The protocols, already present in literature, have been conceived to better manage the power budget of the nodes and are particularly suitable to cover the energy issues that wide agriculture scenario can request. This study aims to indicate which of the protocols eligible for this scenario is the most suitable. Comparative simulation test will be shown.
2020
3031177177
Cagnetti, M., Leccisi, M., Leccese, F. (2020). Reliability comparison of routing protocols for WSNs in wide agriculture scenarios by means of ηl index. In SENSORNETS 2020 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sensor Networks (pp.169-176). SciTePress [10.5220/0009365401690176].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11590/364706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact