The growing international competition has increased the incentive of preserving local expertise by preventing its use by a third party whose product does not conform to the applicable standards. This is one of the main objectives of the Geographical Indication quality scheme. Geographical Indications (GIs) play an increasingly important role in trade negotiations between the EU and other countries. However, to what extent GIs support international trade is not clear. This paper reviews the economic literature on the internalization effects of GIs, discusses data sources and meta-analyses papers estimating the trade effects of the GI policy scheme. Most of the existing studies agree on an average positive effect of GIs on trade. Our meta-analysis shows that the premium is however lower for wines and PDOs, products adopting stricter regulations. Lower effects are estimated by analysis conducted at aggregated spatial levels (country) or limited to specific case studies. By contrast, effects are more consistent when using cross-category data and for studies providing evidence from European GIs.

DE FILIPPIS, F., Giua, M., Salvatici, L., VAQUERO PINEIRO, C. (2021). The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?. In The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope? [10.22004/ag.econ.315147].

The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?

Fabrizio De Filippis
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Mara Giua
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Luca Salvatici
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro
2021

Abstract

The growing international competition has increased the incentive of preserving local expertise by preventing its use by a third party whose product does not conform to the applicable standards. This is one of the main objectives of the Geographical Indication quality scheme. Geographical Indications (GIs) play an increasingly important role in trade negotiations between the EU and other countries. However, to what extent GIs support international trade is not clear. This paper reviews the economic literature on the internalization effects of GIs, discusses data sources and meta-analyses papers estimating the trade effects of the GI policy scheme. Most of the existing studies agree on an average positive effect of GIs on trade. Our meta-analysis shows that the premium is however lower for wines and PDOs, products adopting stricter regulations. Lower effects are estimated by analysis conducted at aggregated spatial levels (country) or limited to specific case studies. By contrast, effects are more consistent when using cross-category data and for studies providing evidence from European GIs.
DE FILIPPIS, F., Giua, M., Salvatici, L., VAQUERO PINEIRO, C. (2021). The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?. In The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope? [10.22004/ag.econ.315147].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11590/394539
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact